World Class Blogs

Complete Guide of Participatory Monitoring, Evaluation & Reporting (MER)

Monitoring

Importance of Improved Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting

Organizations believe that they can add value, maintain the standards of their support quality and remain relevant to the needs, potentials, and opportunities of the beneficiaries only by constantly improving their monitoring, evaluation, and Reporting (MER) capacities. In order to improve its MER capacities, it is important first to discuss these capacities and then to discuss the means of strengthening them.

Design

Design refers to the design of projects that are prepared to meet specific objectives. It is important to have a quality design as this will help ensure that programs are impact-oriented and are easier to monitor and evaluate. Quality design will be based on:

SMART

Goal:

A goal is a general statement of what should be done to solve a problem. It defines broadly, what is expected out of a project. The final destination

Generating structure and strategies:

How do we get what we want with what we have?

It involves

Indicator

A specific realistic target for measuring or judging if the objectives are achieved and providing bases for monitoring, reviews, and evaluation, indicators can be of six types.

Quantitative Indicators:

Quantitative indicators are SMART-ER

Example: Ten boreholes completed in ten villages in six months

Qualitative Indicators:

Qualitative indicators are SPICED

Example: No stagnant water was observed around boreholes during the weekly observation walk    in each of the ten villages

Process Indicator

Process indication measures the process to see what kind and quality of outputs are produced and how things are going on. Quantity, Quality, and Time

Example: Member of health workers trained in the preparation of ORS and holding one session per week after six months.

Impact Indicator

The impact indicator measures the impact and is usually used at the outcome level to see what are the quantity measures and quality judgment by which achievements of a purpose or outcome can be judged.

With enhanced design capacity, program development will be more participatory and relevant.

Monitoring

Monitoring is a regular observation/continuous process of recording and checking ongoing activities to see whether the activities are on track and progressing as they were planned. Monitoring is done through supervision to look at the input, process, and output levels. Monitoring reports enable decision-making in order to achieve the targets/objectives more efficiently and effectively. It also provides data for evaluation. There are two types of monitoring.

Process Monitoring:

In this type of monitoring, we go through the process that how some activity is carried out whether that process is easy to access or hard to access.

Progress Monitoring:

In this type of monitoring, we only go through the output or results that what was the target and what is achieved. We don’t pay attention to that how it is achieved.

Note: The goals and objectives provide the basis for monitoring and evaluating a project and they are the yardsticks upon which project success or failure is measured.

Enhanced monitoring capacity should:

Monitoring provides information that will be useful in:

Note: Monitoring is an integral part of every project, from start to finish.

Types of Monitoring Indicators

Input indicators:

Describe what goes on in the project (e.g. number of bricks brought on-site and amount of money spent)

Output indicators:

Describe the project activity (e.g. number of classrooms built)

Outcome indicators:

Describe the product of the activity (e.g. number of pupils attending the school

Impact indicators:

Measure change in conditions of the community (e.g. reduced illiteracy in the community)

Techniques for collecting data/information

With enhanced monitoring capacity program implementation will be on schedule and meet targets efficiently.

Evaluation

Evaluation is the overview of a project to see what has been achieved did the program achieved its purpose, and whether the achievements are relevant, efficient, and effective. Look at output, outcome, and impact level. It provides data for decision-makers and recommendations for future planning.

Evaluation: Drawing lessons from the project implementation experience and using the lessons in re-planning of projects in that community and elsewhere.

Evaluation helps in the future:

With enhanced evaluation capacity, programs will be able to:

Purpose of Evaluation:

There are different reasons for evaluating a project.

How to evaluate:

There are different methods for evaluating a project

With enhanced evaluation capacity program would be able to highlight its achievements and learn from its experiences.

Summary of the Relationship:

Reporting

Reporting refers to preparing documents related to the overall program and individual projects. These documents capture and present in a concise manner the progress being achieved against targets and objectives. With enhanced reporting capacity should:

With enhanced reporting capacity the program will be able to document and present its strategies and achievements to a broader audience.

Objectives of MER Unit

The overall objective of the MER Unit is

Specific objectives of the MER Unit are:

Design a work plan

In order to draw a good work plan, the implementers should:

The work plan is a guide to project implementation and a basis for project monitoring; it is there for helps to:

MER Key Functions:

In order to meet its objectives, MER will perform several key functions:

Main Principles of MER

The following principles will drive MER:

MER Deliverables

A fully functional MER will prepare and deliver an annual plan for Organizations that will incorporate:

In addition, MER will maintain a record of project documents, i.e. proposal, baseline survey reports, interim reports submitted, final report submitted, and any evaluations. When there are opportunities, MER will provide support to senior management in designing proposals for new projects.

Relations between MER and Projects:

MER and projects must develop a clear line of responsibilities so as to foster synergy between the two. Whenever the word ‘monitoring’ or ‘evaluation’ or ‘reporting’ is used, there is a natural tendency for the project staff to expect that MER would undertake and perform these functions. Given the nature of Organizations’ operations, MER cannot and indeed should not undertake all monitoring, evaluation, and reporting (MER) functions. MER’s role is to provide support to the project staff members to undertake their own (MER) functions in an improved manner; MER’s role is to strengthen project capacities for internal MER.

Project staff members will have their own MER formats and schedules and must pursue them. MER will provide support to ensure that the internal MER functions of projects are meeting the requirements of Organizations in terms of timeliness and quality. At senior management’s behest, MER will undertake external MER functions of projects.

It is the senior management’s role to support MER and projects to develop an understanding and partnerships to take forward the Organizations’ agenda; all too often monitoring sections and project staff members become confused about their roles and this leads to inefficiency. Given the nature of the work, some functions and roles have to be undertaken by MER and some by projects. It is possible that projects also need strengthening. For example, any project identifies a need for a position that will undertake internal MER functions. This internalization will improve the timeliness and quality of the Project’s performance quality.

Once the MER Unit is structured and becomes operational within the broader framework presented, it will develop its own dynamics. It will generate its own momentum, generate its own energy; it becomes a living organism, striving for growth and for a future.

For more blogs visit our main page World Class Blogs and business website Sherakat Network.

Exit mobile version